A commercial bid invitation arrives
Project, location, scope, due date, documents, and contact indexed
AI WORKFLOWS BUILT FOR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
Praktos AI qualifies project inquiries, coordinates bid invitations, tracks subcontractor and document status, routes RFIs and change events, and keeps field-to-office updates visible.
Focused workflow builds start at $795. Connected systems are scoped around your tools, rules, and volume.
You approve the rules, handoff, and success metric before anything reaches a customer.
Designed around the software construction teams already know
Real platforms. No rip-and-replace pitch.
Procore
Buildertrend
Autodesk Construction Cloud
CoConstruct
JobTread
QuickBooksProject, location, scope, due date, documents, and contact indexed
Trade, geography, project size, capacity, and deadline rules checked
Uncertainty goes to a personGo/no-go review packet assigned
Context includedStatus and next owner recordedFewer poor-fit pursuits, tighter estimate follow-up, and clearer owner-to-project-team handoffs.
“Bid invites now arrive as a decision packet with scope, due date, location, and missing documents. Estimating spends less time sorting inboxes.”
MichaelConstruction Company President“RFIs, submittals, and insurance documents have clear owners and escalation dates instead of living across email threads.”
AnnaConstruction Operations Manager“Daily logs produce a concise list of items for PM review. The system organizes the facts without making contractual calls.”
JoshGeneral ContractorEach system starts with a real operational trigger, applies your approved rules, and ends with a visible outcome or human owner.
Capture scope, location, value, schedule, delivery method, drawings, contacts, and bid deadlines.
Estimators see fit and missing information before investing time.Track RFIs, submittals, COIs, daily logs, photos, selections, change events, and approvals.
Every administrative blocker has a status and owner.Turn approved field inputs into summaries, notifications, tasks, and client updates across existing systems.
Project judgment stays with PMs, supers, and trade experts.No generic chatbot list. These are real trigger-to-outcome systems designed around the work your team already performs.
Incoming bid invitations are indexed and scored against company-approved trade, geography, size, capacity, and timing rules.
Open items are monitored against responsible party and due date, with approved reminders and escalation.
Approved daily-log inputs are organized into potential follow-ups for PM review without making contractual conclusions.
Start with the construction opportunities your team is not consistently working today. Change every input to match your real operation.
Replace each starting value with a conservative number from your construction companies operation.
The system earns trust by making every decision boundary, exception, and business result visible.
Document the trigger, current handoffs, tools, delays, and the number that should improve.
Agree what the system may do, what it must never do, and exactly when a person takes over.
Build against your current stack and test normal, duplicate, failure, opt-out, and exception paths.
Measure outcomes, review unresolved items, and expand only after the first workflow is reliable.
Every engagement defines the trigger, approved actions, staff handoff, failure paths, and the number that should improve.
Build and test one valuable workflow—such as bid invitation qualifier—before committing to a larger system.
Connect intake, approved decisions, customer communication, scheduling or workflow status, and staff takeover across your current stack.
Build a staged operating layer across lead flow, service delivery, follow-up, exceptions, and management visibility.
Every workflow is designed around the professional, safety, privacy, and operational boundaries of construction companies.
The workflow does not interpret contract rights, approve changes, accept scope, or make entitlement decisions.
The system can route reported conditions but does not replace safety plans, competent persons, or field judgment.
Cost, schedule, design, submittal, RFI, and change-event approvals stay with authorized people.
What the system handles, where people step in, and how the first workflow is scoped.
Book a Systems AssessmentIt can organize the invitation and compare it with your approved fit criteria. The final go/no-go decision remains with your team.
Yes, where supported access is available. We define the exact records, permissions, and write actions before building.
It can organize approved fields and draft review items. PMs and superintendents retain decisions about scope, safety, schedule, cost, and responsibility.
Bid-invitation qualification or submittal/RFI due-date coordination is usually a focused start with visible time and cycle outcomes.
One focused construction workflow with a defined trigger, approved action, staff handoff, failure-path testing, and one KPI. Connected systems are scoped separately after the first workflow is mapped.
A written systems assessment showing the first construction workflow, the software it touches, the rules it follows, the exceptions staff owns, and the number that will show whether it works.
No. Conversation is only one interface. The value is in connecting intake, approved decisions, scheduling or workflow status, follow-up, staff takeover, and reporting across your existing construction operation.
Failure paths are designed before launch. Duplicate requests, missing data, unavailable software, opt-outs, timeouts, and uncertain situations stop safely and create a visible staff-owned exception instead of disappearing.
Yes. Staff takeover, pause conditions, approval gates, escalation recipients, and audit visibility are part of the workflow design. Automation remains inside the operating boundaries your team approves.
No. The recommended approach is one valuable workflow, one owner, and one measurable result. Additional workflows are added only after the first system is reliable and your team is comfortable operating it.
Bring the current process, software, biggest bottleneck, and edge cases. Leave with the first trigger, workflow, human handoff, and KPI mapped out.
Book a Systems Assessment